Canonical page: https://mixerai.org/en/knowledge/compare/seedance-2-vs-kling-3-0-turbo-vs-grok-video/ [Mixer AI](https://mixerai.org/) › [Knowledge Base](https://mixerai.org/en/knowledge/) › [Comparison](https://mixerai.org/en/knowledge/compare/) › Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3.0 Turbo vs Grok Video # Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3.0 Turbo vs Grok Video There is no single three-model video in the corpus, but there are two direct A/B tests with the same control model: Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3.0 Turbo and Seedance 2.0 vs Grok Video. That supports a useful group map without inventing a Kling-vs-Grok round. [Try it on Mixer AI](https://mixerai.org/?dl=kb_seedance-2-vs-kling-3-0-turbo-vs-grok-video#/canvas) ## Key differences Seedance 2.0 is the common baseline in both direct tests. Kling 3.0 Turbo produced a strong POV and some good dialogue composition, while losing more often on complex action. Grok Video beat Seedance on one reference-text check but lost on lip sync and a complex storyboard. ## Specifications | Spec | Seedance 2.0 | Kling 3.0 Turbo | Grok Imagine Video | Model variants | Mini / Fast / Pro | Turbo | Grok Imagine Video | Generation modes | from text / from first and last frames / from references | from text / from first frame | from text / from references | First frame | Yes | Yes | No | Last frame | Yes | No | No | Input photos | up to 9 | No | up to 7 | Input videos | up to 3 | No | No | Input audio files | up to 3 | No | No | Input video length | 2–15 s | No | No | Input audio length | 2–15 s | No | No | Extra modes | No | No | normal / fun / spicy | Output audio | Can be enabled or disabled | No | No | Minimum duration | 4 s | 3 s | 6 s | Maximum duration | 15 s | 15 s | 30 s | Resolutions | 480p / 720p / 1080p / 4K | 720p / 1080p | 480p / 720p / 1080p | Aspect ratios | 9:16 / 16:9 / 1:1 / 21:9 / 4:3 / 3:4 / adaptive | 9:16 / 16:9 / 1:1 | 9:16 / 16:9 / 1:1 / 2:3 / 3:2 | Prompt limit | 20,000 characters | 2,500 characters | 5,000 characters | Price, 1 s · 1080p | ≈ 61.32 coins · Pro | ≈ 14.08 coins | ≈ 5.12 coins ## What the two A/B tests connect | Check | Seedance 2.0 | Kling 3.0 Turbo | Grok Video | Complex action | Strong in both evidence sets | Lost several action rounds to Seedance | Started convincingly, then motion broke down | POV / camera feel | Competitive | Strong motorcycle POV | Not directly compared with Kling | In-frame text | Weaker in the direct Grok A/B | No shared test | Strong reference-text result | Lip sync / dialogue | Beat Grok directly; close with Kling in some scenes | Close in selected dialogue scenes | Added extra dialogue and mistimed speakers | Complex storyboard | Followed the sequence much better than Grok | No shared test | Failed the requested sequence Missing intersections stay missing: the sources do not directly compare Kling and Grok. ## Direct Seedance vs Kling - Seedance was preferred in the action round for the action itself and timing. - Kling produced the more realistic vlog-like motorcycle POV and made that round close. - In the avalanche scene, Seedance produced the more logical composition and sequence. ## Direct Seedance vs Grok - Grok preserved lettering on a reference image better in close-up. - In the lip-sync test, Grok added an extra line and mistimed speakers; Seedance was more accurate. - On the storyboard, Seedance preserved the sequence while Grok failed the complex shot plan. ## What we compare [ Seedance 2.0 Common control in two direct A/B tests; video input and up to 15 seconds. ](https://mixerai.org/en/knowledge/video/seedance-2/)[ Kling 3.0 Turbo Up to 15 seconds, one image input, 720p/1080p. ](https://mixerai.org/en/knowledge/video/kling-3-0-turbo/)[ Grok Imagine Video Up to 30 seconds, up to 7 images, normal/fun/spicy modes, up to 1080p. ](https://mixerai.org/en/knowledge/video/grok-video/) ## FAQ Can this evidence say Kling is better than Grok or vice versa? No. There is no direct Kling 3.0 Turbo vs Grok Video A/B in these sources; they are only connected through the shared Seedance 2.0 baseline. Why keep a three-model page? It makes the evidence graph explicit—where results overlap and where they do not—while comparing current Mixer AI product constraints across all three. ## See also [Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3.0 Turbo→](https://mixerai.org/en/knowledge/compare/seedance-2-vs-kling-3-0-turbo/)[Grok Imagine Video vs Seedance 2.0→](https://mixerai.org/en/knowledge/compare/grok-video-vs-seedance-2/)[Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.5→](https://mixerai.org/en/knowledge/compare/seedance-2-vs-seedance-2-5/) [Try it on Mixer AI](https://mixerai.org/?dl=kb_seedance-2-vs-kling-3-0-turbo-vs-grok-video#/canvas)