Mixer AI › Knowledge Base › Comparison › Seedance 2.0 vs Wan 3.0: technical and visual comparison

Seedance 2.0 vs Wan 3.0: technical and visual comparison

This compares two models that are available in the current Mixer AI catalog. The table below is built from current product controls, while the visual section shows what to inspect with the same inputs and prompt instead of inventing one universal winner.

Try it on Mixer AI

Key differences

Seedance 2.0: A short scene with your character, motion and sound, with Mini, Fast and Pro versions to choose from.

Wan 3.0: A scene up to 30 seconds long, combining photos, motion and audio references in one request.

Start with the specification table: it reflects current modes, input media, duration, resolution, aspect ratios and a normalized price where a fair comparison is possible.

Specifications

Spec	Seedance 2.0	Wan 3.0
Model variants	Mini / Fast / Pro	Standard / Prime
Generation modes	from text / from first and last frames / from references	from text / from first and last frames / from references
First frame	Yes	Yes
Last frame	Yes	Yes
Input photos	up to 9	up to 10
Input videos	up to 3	up to 5
Input audio files	up to 3	up to 5
Input video length	2–15 s	1–15 s
Input audio length	2–15 s	1–15 s
Output audio	Can be enabled or disabled	Can be enabled or disabled
Minimum duration	4 s	2 s
Maximum duration	15 s	30 s
Resolutions	480p / 720p / 1080p / 4K	1080p / 720p / 480p
Aspect ratios	9:16 / 16:9 / 1:1 / 21:9 / 4:3 / 3:4 / adaptive	9:16 / 16:9 / 1:1 / adaptive / 4:3 / 3:4
Prompt limit	20,000 characters	20,000 characters
Price, 1 s · 1080p	≈ 64.88 coins · Pro	21.84 coins · Standard

What to compare visually

For a fair A/B test, use the same scene and, where both modes allow it, the same first frame. Inspect motion continuity, character and object consistency, physics and contacts, camera behavior, temporal deformation, in-clip cuts and audio synchronization.

What to inspect with Seedance 2.0

A short scene with your character, motion and sound, with Mini, Fast and Pro versions to choose from.

Generate from text, first and last frames, or a set of references.
In Mixer AI, Mini and Fast offer 480p and 720p; Pro adds 1080p and 4K.
Version and resolution are separate settings. Selecting Pro does not automatically select 1080p or 4K.
Reference video adds billable time. A lower rate with video can still produce a larger total.

What to inspect with Wan 3.0

A scene up to 30 seconds long, combining photos, motion and audio references in one request.

Text, one or two frames, or references. Mixer AI offers Standard and Prime.
480P, 720P or 1080P; reference mode accepts up to 10 photos, 5 videos and 5 audio files.
Input video time is added to output time in the price calculation.
A long generation is not precise editing. Inspect transitions and object consistency throughout.

How to run a fair comparison

Lock one prompt, aspect ratio and a duration or resolution that both models actually support.
If input modes differ, compare the shared workflow first and test each model's extra controls separately.
Run more than one attempt: a single output reflects one seed, not the model's overall consistency.
Score prompt adherence, visual artifacts, reference preservation and the cost of the setting you would really use separately.

What we compare

Seedance 2.0

A short scene with your character, motion and sound, with Mini, Fast and Pro versions to choose from.

Wan 3.0

A scene up to 30 seconds long, combining photos, motion and audio references in one request.

FAQ

How should I compare Seedance 2.0 and Wan 3.0 fairly?

Use a workflow both models share, keep inputs and prompt identical, then run several generations. Compare prompt adherence, visual consistency and the price of the setting you need as separate dimensions.

Are both models available in Mixer AI?

Yes. This page is generated only for models in the current public Mixer AI catalog; if a model leaves the catalog, the automated comparison must stop passing validation.

Which model is better?

There is no universal answer. First eliminate a model that cannot accept the input, duration, resolution or format you need, then compare outputs on your own scene. The table highlights only measurable advantages in individual specifications.