Both versions are currently visible in Mixer AI, but their controls differ: Nano Banana 2 accepts up to 14 images with explicit 1K/2K/4K output, while Lite accepts up to 10 and uses automatic resolution. Both versions were run through the same set of tests.
| Spec | Nano Banana 2 | Nano Banana 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Generation modes | from text / photo editing | from text / photo editing |
| Input photos | up to 14 | up to 10 |
| Resolutions | 1K / 2K / 4K | Auto |
| Aspect ratios | 9:16 / 16:9 / 1:1 / auto / 2:3 / 3:2 / 3:4 / 4:3 / 4:5 / 5:4 / 21:9 / 4:1 / 1:4 / 8:1 / 1:8 | 9:16 / 16:9 / 1:1 / auto / 2:3 / 3:2 / 3:4 / 4:3 / 4:5 / 5:4 / 21:9 / 4:1 / 1:4 / 8:1 / 1:8 |
| Prompt limit | 20,000 characters | 20,000 characters |
| Price per image (different settings) | 8 coins · 1K | 5 coins · Auto |
There is no shared resolution for a direct price comparison, so each price includes its setting and is not highlighted as cheaper.
The side-by-side points to a trade-off rather than a simple quality ladder.
The clearest current difference is output control: Nano Banana 2 exposes 1K, 2K and 4K while Lite chooses resolution automatically. If a job needs a specific output size or more than ten source images, that product constraint matters more than a subjective win on one test image.
No. The direct test included scenes where Lite looked just as detailed or was preferred. The full model did better on the harder geometry example.
Not in the current Mixer AI interface. Lite uses Auto resolution rather than a 1K/2K/4K selector.